ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 1:  Chief Judge (scoring) - Charles Baker - GBR

Ranking Index = 0.98
 Dan Smith, Dunstable , 18-19 April 2026
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Sports - Glider, 1st KnownSequence
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Posi No Raw/FPS J-rank Diff
1 P002 7.0 8.0 6.0 9.0 8.0 8.5 9.0 8.0 8.0 6.5 0 1020.50 2 -1
    ASK 21 EPD 7.06 7.88 6.21 9.03 8.11 8.57 9.52 7.88 7.91 6.73   1019.00    
2 Neil Oakley - GBR 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 0 1041.45 1 +1
    ASK 21 EPD 8.77 7.88 7.91 8.57 8.57 9.03 7.88 7.88 7.91 7.19   1039.77    
3 P007 9.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.5 0 969.87 3
    ASK 21 EPD 8.77 7.88 6.21 8.11 7.19 8.11 7.88 7.88 7.06 6.73   968.81    
4 P003 8.0 7.0 AV 5.0 7.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 4.5 1 832.37 4
    ASK 21 EPD 7.91 6.25 7.60 5.35 7.19 6.27 7.88 7.88 7.06 4.89   853.12    
5 P008 9.0 8.0 7.0 HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ 8.5 0 351.51 5
    ASK 21 EPD 8.77 7.88 7.06 CHZ CHZ CHZ CHZ CHZ CHZ 8.57   355.80    
    0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0   2
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 18 max None HZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - 1  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark 1 2    
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

 
 This Judge and O/all totals for all Judges

 

   Judge 1 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge x1 Ch.Judge
Simon Smith Fig-3 AVGE 7.0 8.0 OK
  ASK 21 EPD   7.60 7.17 8.03  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.67, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.87 Panel average mark = 7.67, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.87
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
FPS score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Neil Oakley - GBR ASK 21 1039.77 -   1012.76 27.01     1     2     + 1     0.67 68.30%
Laura Martin - H/C ASK 21 1019.00 -   1025.15 6.15     2     1     - 1     0.31 31.70%
                  0.98    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score		   Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		        
Dave Rendall - H/C ASK 21 968.81   961.60 7.21     3     3            
Simon Smith - H/C ASK 21 853.12   850.14 2.98     4     4            
Elliot Cox - H/C ASK 21 355.80   351.42 4.38     5     5            
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 0.67

 Min = 0.00 Average = 0.33
Panel:

= 0.67

 = -0.67  = 0.00
 
Most favoured Least favoured Judge Avg GBR x 1 Ranking Index totals per nation Using the +/- rank differences to show national bias from the most to the least favoured teams.

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 06/07/24